Category Archives: Photography

This is for those pieces that have to do directly with assignments I shoot for the paper and my impressions and feelings about them.

Let’s Party! Tea, anyone?

The TEA Party: Enough is Enough

I appreciate a good movement as much as the next guy. I love a grassroots swell and a freshly formed band wagon with enough room for even the most armchair of supports and fair weather of fans to hop aboard before the central transfer to the next “big thing.” Give me a bunch of halfcocked concepts and a catchy jingle and I’ll kick back and watch that rickety bucket run itself all the way in to oblivion, joining it’s trendy forefathers in the meme stream graveyard. Couple this with my overt and unabashed distaste for political circus performing and the attention grabbing, politically incorrect if not unapologetic sound bite machines in the Republican parties screaming “fire” in a meat locker, and you’ve got the makings for one of the greatest shows on Earth outside of a back alley snuff film peep show at 50 cents a minute. Unfortunately, the TEA Party, an epitome that gets me literally (No, I did not mean literally) harder than Georgia Pine, is still rolling on down the road despite itself, and again finds itself parked out on street corners and in front of government buildings screaming for…something, anything, if not everything and still nothing.

The Tea Party started in late 2009, but really burst on to the scene in 2010 with Tax Day protests outside anything resembling a government building, including one unfortunate misunderstanding that led 150 people to protest the unfair taxation in this country in front of a Denny’s in Topeka, KS. After some real movement in the pubic eye, and the appearance of the pseudo-homely, folksy tundra wisdom of one near vice president turned reality star, Sarah Palin, the party began to gain political ground. Whatever ground they have been able to grab in the political arenas has been helped as much as it’s been hampered by the very party itself and it’s elected officials and unfortunate choice in public mouthpieces.

It’s all in the campaigning they do as a “party.” If you go to the Tea Party Patriots website, one faction of the now fractured party, you find some of their ideals and what they stand for. Their slogan, or mantra, or whatever you might call it, is as follows:

“A community committed to standing together, shoulder to shoulder, to protect our country and the Constitution upon which we were founded!”

The exclamation point is theirs, not mine. So they are united, they are committed to the Constitution, and they are excited. Ok, maybe they aren’t Tebow excited, but they are pumped enough to outline their mission statement with an implied pounding of fists on desks invented for the purpose of this punchline.

What I have also gathered from my direct contact with these people, is that they are basically Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh fanboys and girls that would give Glenn Beck a blowjob behind the aforementioned Denny’s if given half a chance. They are fairly fundamentalist, Christian, founding father/log cabin Republican racists, homophobes, and fairly hateful of liberals. Compromise is not an option. If politics was war, these people would happily exercise their God-given right to refuse quarter to liberal soldiers in a second. They think the US is their home, and liberals can fuck off and die. So…I guess they are open to compromise and fresh ideas then? Shoulder to shoulder, I gather, is with like-minded, old white people who are afraid of everything that doesn’t attend their local Evangelical church potluck with casserole in hand every third Sunday after sermon.

Now, before you go thinking that this is just some unsubstantiated claim form some liberal in every derogatory sense of the word, I implore you to shut up and read. This is a library, and you need not be muttering to yourself like an idiot in the stacks. If you’re reading this in a Starbucks, though, then go ahead and laugh you pretentious Berkley trust fund baby because you’re not my demographic either. Grab your summer scarf and your Birkenstocks and walk around the Hashbury with an unearned sense of belonging.

This is some Kung Fu grip G.I. Joe action figure stuff. Facts are included. Fifty-nine percent of all Tea Partiers are male. Only twenty-three percent are under 45, while nearly thirty percent are over 65. Eighty-nine percent are white. Ninety-five percent are either Republican or Independent, while seventy-three percent describe themselves as conservative. Eighty-three percent are either Protestant or Catholic, but oddly (and not surprisingly enough) only thirty-eight percent attend weekly church services. Oh, and fifty-eight percent of them are armed. It’s a passing point, but I felt that with all that other white Christian BS, I needed to complete the cliché trifecta with a reference to being well armed…for protection. Riiiiiiggghhht, “protection.”

I often get a laugh from how non-Tea Party Republicans talk about this fractured faction of exceptionally right leaning Suzie and Stan Homemakers. It’s like they are talking about an alcoholic brother or a cousin that hasn’t been right after getting kicked by that mule two summers back. They’ve got some great ideas. They have a lot of passion, something we need more of in the Republican party today. They are fired up. They are just decent, hard-working Americans that think this country is on the wrong path. (side note: Why is it that I always feel like I’m being inherently insulted when this is said? These Republicans are decent and hard-working? What about me? Do I maybe think we need to be on a different path as a country? Well, I guess I don’t get any love because I’m liberal and am not inclined to put a Hitler mustache on a picture of Obama and fill in the white spaced with poorly spelled, vague statements about taxes and cap and trade. OK, got that out. Let’s continue.)

I always like to think of the Tea Party as a person. Whenever I can, I like to personify nouns and ideas. I’m able to better get a handle on a problem if it’s got a face. When I think of the Tea Party, I see a sweet old Grandmother. You know, the kind of woman who is beloved on the neighborhood block. She is at every social gathering, and is never in short supply of fresh lemonade and cookies. The kind of woman who every kid in the neighborhood calls Grandma. Her husband passed long ago, her kids all moved away. She has a cute, meandering story for every occasion from when she was a child. Nothing gets her down, and a smile is always just hook and loop away as she knits on her porch in the summer evenings. Then you talk to her after a couple of Manhattans and she lets slip the N-word with a venomous spit and a scowl when you bring up the Johnsons one street over and you realize she’s a racist old bat who reminds you suddenly more of the wench from Hansel and Gretel even though the unassuming smile is back and she’s knitting away as if nothing was amiss.

That's Sarah with an "h," ya hear?

You can package it any way you want, but hate is hate. It can be screaming on a city street holding a sign splashed with heinous references to the most evil men that our President apparently is just one missing razor away from resembling, or it can be hidden under a hand-made afghan in a rocking chair in a small, midwest town and it’s all the same. The Tea Party may have itself a Michelle Bachmann, a Sarah Palin, and some national recognition as a perfect opportunity in April to rail against the “obamination” this country has become, but it will never be anything but b-roll during televised debates on MSNBC and FOX. Same video, different adjectives.

I do have to give credit where credit is due, though. They are still around. They have people, followers, an out dated website (a political party “must have” in 2012), and a PR team that can spin anything in to a crisis and an all-out attack on the nation’s values and Constitution. I just don’t think that people of this angry and closed-minded position will ever understand that this is a diverse nation.

I know that from the inside of a local Tea Party community organization meeting it may look like a very united if not pasty, homogenized country, but unfortunately this is a place so damned diverse you need a genealogist with a Geiger counter to figure out what most of us are made of. I’ve met these people, tried to make sense of their signs, and I’ve looked in to their faces, and there is little there that I can understand.

I get it, some of the angst and frustration, I feel it for them and Republicans after all–Oh hell, for shitty Democrats, too–but the further division of this country and the resistance to possibility and development of new ideas since the good old days of the late 1700’s is a little obtuse and fearful for my liking. Thanks, but I’ll let necessity be my mother, and with change comes the necessity to adapt or die. That’s not me talking, that’s science. Then again, nearly ninety percent of you are religious…so that’s probably falling on ears deaf to anything that’s not from scripture. So, protest on my nostalgic homophobes and middle class anarchists. The Republican party might be a bit embarrassed of you in public since that mule kicked you and you aren’t acting right in front of people, but in private they love you, because your crazy Christian fear-votes count just as much as anyone’s that hasn’t lost a couple of marbles.

Look at This F-ing Guy #37

Who has a van, but no kids

I get the concept of the van. I am fine with the idea of a van. I’m not talking mini-van, pick up the kids from practice kind of thing. I mean a big ass panel van or one of the old chevy vans from the seventies. For those to whom I speak, this is not a work van. This van is not a spare vehicle for when someone needs to move a couch or dispose of a body at midnight. This is not a van for any purpose than as your primary vehicle, and it is nothing but creepy my friend.

So, you have a van? Alright, but is it fuckin’ sweet? Really? Yep, it has a custom gold flake paint job with a wicked lookin’ wizard casting a spell on the half-naked maiden emblazoned on the side. That’s a totally awesome pin-striping job along with the full-carpeted interior, beanbags, hot plate, fridge, and those sweet-ass rims. This thing rules your face! Indeed. Then again, maybe you are the van owner that went the other way. Some rickety looking rust bucket that has seen more bad days than good. A van that looks like it’s baby van-children would be named “tetanus” and “herpes simplex 2.” Seriously, your shit-brown van with your cracked window, bent antennae, and faded Grateful Dead bears sticker in the rear window, looks like it should be selling ruffie-cones to the ringtone version of “the song that never ends.” This van of yours should be in a mugshot book, I wouldn’t put it past this van to actually sodomize a Prius against it’s will. Sorry, some vans are just born bad.

Both vans seem to come with sleeveless band t-shirts, aviator shades, and a member’s only jacket. You might be the cool guy with a bandana hanging out of his pocket or a wicked jean jacket, like “The Boss!” You definitely have a moustache, that’s for sure. Vans of any kind just remind me of moving rooms on wheels; like a gypsy rapist’s wet dream. Just rolling in to town and then rolling off with someone’s cousin like some deranged pied piper. This country seems to love it’s neighborhood watch programs. Give any grandma or retired man enough free time and he’ll sign up for neighborhood watch patrol walking his Lhasa Apso, Trixie. Then there is the cul-de-sac neighborhood where everyone is watching out for the other guy’s kid…and at the top of every one of their list of things to look out for are men in capes with burlap sacks, and VANS. The latter is actually underlined twice…in red pen.

Either van creeps me out intensely because either van feels like it should only be owned if the owner has kids. The rickety basement on wheels, good for keeping women tied to a mock radiator, should be filled with like four rows of kids and some soccer balls on the way to the district finals or some shit. The epic van in pristine shape, might be the van dad bought in high school before he got “all lame and shit” and had kids. That super cool van might be a mildly functional version of it’s former glory. It is certainly not the primary form of transporting the demon hybrid children to and from their short-lived and otherwise expensive and emotionally draining endeavors.

All I’m saying is that if you own a van, you’d better be an electrician or a father, because anything else and you belong on a list, Mr. Creeper VonRapeyville.

All Saints Parish: The Pentacost

Here at Poppyc**k, we pride ourselves on covering a wide array of topics. Our mission, more than anything, is to give people a peek into the things they otherwise might not be exposed. We want to openly discuss and tackle bigger issues. It has always baffled the staff here how the ideas that cry out for debate and conversation the most, seem to be those that are thought to be tragically taboo. No one wants to talk about abortion, immigration, racism, terrorism, politics, religion, or just about anything that ruffles feather and rattles cages.

If you want to stay friends with anyone, the school of thought has always been to avoid these topics. Well, we say “fuck that.” Our staff is entirely single, no girlfriends to speak of, and there is a clear reason for that: we like to talk about these things. On a first date, we have been known to bring up everything that you should avoid. Family troubles, politics, religion, our borderline alcoholism, and our fetish for semicolons. None of us has ever been any good at playing the game when it comes to social situations, and the chances of us learning how to play are approximately slim to none. I guess that’s why we do this.

That being said, this video is about Craig Chapman, Priest at All Saints Parish in Ventura, Calif. Nothing might stick out about this church at first glance, but if you take the time to look around and notice some of the decor, you might come across the rainbow flag synonymous with the gay community and any “fabulous” parade you have ever seen. ASP is the only openly-supportive LGBT church in Ventura County. It’s not “gay church.” They’re not gaying up the bible or only reading the passages that justify their lifestyle, nor are they plotting and furthering their gay agenda; that’s on Thursday night bible study. No, these are God’s children worshipping and praising the Lord, almost as if they’re just people…that’s crazy, right? I know, it’s as if they are just like you and I in the eyes of the Lord and give Him all the glory.

This was the celebration of the Pentacost, the birth of the church. They sang “Happy Birthday,” but since it is copyrighted material (it took two people to write that song), we didn’t want to pay the fine, but trust us, they sang it to the church. You don’t have to be gay to attend the church, nor do you have to be straight to love God; they prove that here. By all accounts, this could be a church in anytown, USA, if you’re going on the sermon and the scripture…and that was kind of the point of this whole video. Their sexual orientation is a non-issue in the eyes of the Lord. It is just who they are and they praise God, thanking Him for all His blessings. Everything else is just poppyc**k.

POS, Dessa, and Grieves Bring Lyricism to the Troubador in LA

The Troubador on the outskirts of Beverly Hills

My tastes are for the microbrews of the music industry; those that hand-craft beats with everything from violin cuts to trumpet solos while carefully constructing jaw-dropping lyrics from a vocabulary that would make for a formidable ‘Scrabble” opponent. Artists in the truest sense of the word are those that make music they love, and don’t really care if others do. They give no thought to the mass appeal because they are making it not for the masses, but a select few that may have a thirst for their witch’s brew. On Friday night at the Troubador, not half a block from the Beverly Hills city limits, three such craftspeople: P.O.S., Dessa, and Grieves put on a veritable hip-hop clinic that showed the mainstream that the real spectacle is not under the big top, but in the sideshows during their LA stop on the “Every Never is Now” Tour.

Coming to see these three rappers is unlike any other hip-hop experience. You won’t find talk of hoes, dubs, or moet. None of them will tell you about how gangster they are, how much their rides cost, or how they might do a snitch. This is music that goes further and deeper than that; music that draws from life experiences and beckons an echo from those with whom it rings true. If you search for the theme music to your life then these people are truly the story tellers that can put life to a beat. You will hear tragedy, challenging situations, and not settling in life. There will be socially conscious songs, political statements of an intellectual nature, and a mastery of rhyme and conceptual lyrical imagery like wet paint on a canvas, dripping with color.

Dessa Darling opened the show

Dessa opened the show under deep blue light with a voice like velvet wisps of cigarette smoke drifting in a windowless room singing “Kites”. Her music makes me think of a poet with a musical obsession more than a rapper. Her lyrics are wry and clever always interspersed with a melodious voice that riffs tongue and cheek as much as it throws a mean right hook. She is the result of a philosophy degree and too much whiskey, I saw this written one time, and you are truly aware of this when you hear her music; clearly a rapper with late fees on her library card. With an acute awareness of the human condition, I think what sets her apart is her slam poetry breakdowns she does. When you hear “Hallelujah” performed at a hip-hop show with a cappella verses and an unique and absorbingly sung chorus, you know you are in for an amazing show. She threw down the gauntlet with a sui generis set unlike any hip-hop you will find out there; honestly, how many rappers do you know with a published book of poetry for sale at the swag table?

Grieves came next with Budo, his DJ, and this kid is something to see. Looking no older than 16 and weighing maybe 120 lbs. soaking wet this man of diminutive stature casts a rap shadow that has grown in leaps and bounds from his days in his hometown of Seattle, WA. Grieves is oh so musically inclined with the beats he makes. Just like Dessa and P.O.S., there is more than just drums and reverb in his tracks. You will find trumpets, piano, and guitar riffs, performed live by the multi-tasking Budo, that scream Eddie Van Halen influences. Grieves’ lyrics are funny at times with admissions of his odd look and his lack of knowledge as to the definition of “hyfie”. He also speaks of troubles with women, human interaction, and tough times. Admittedly a family guy, really loves his friends and family, and he raps about life and loss while not getting depressing, it always seems to be up-tempo enough to not bring the listener down. The crowd loved his set and despite not striking a large frame, he loves being behind the mic and it shows in the comfort and ownership he shows when he performs.

P.O.S. came next, the headliner of the night. P.O.S. is something to be heard. An amazing fusion of pseudo-punk rock and socially conscious, lyrical hip-hop, his music matches his stage performance; it’s a hip-hop bar-fight with your brain from start to finish. In three albums and many years with doomtree before signing with Rhymesayers, P.O.S. cultivated a powerful and focused voice inspiring people as much as attempting to unsettle our complacency. He doesn’t call himself a political rapper, but it is definitely a definable portion of his work. A not so subtle call to the disenchanted and disenfranchised permeates his lyrics between personally significant events and intimate messages of the heart. Beats dripping with rock guitar, drums, and a cacophony of other perfectly appropriate sounds make him feel at home on the edge of the stage screaming at the top of his lungs lyrics that the crowd reciprocates just as ferociously. He will cover everything from challenges following your dream and being happy in your life, to social issues we all face privately in a slow-motion agony. P.O.S. is truly aware of his surroundings and what he feels, using the stage and the mic as an outlet to entertain and educate as much as provoke and disrupt.

POS, Dessa, and Grieves do "No Homeowners" together

His stage show almost ruins his albums for me for a week or so after. There is no justice coming out of my speakers for the energy he has when he is on a stage. One of the most accessible artists I’ve ever met, he’ll be out chatting and taking photos with fans before the doors even open. He walks among the fans at ease while Dessa and Grieves perform. Same with Grieves and Dessa; stand at the bar long enough and you might find Dessa sidling up next to you after her set to order a drink, Grieves you will find without fail at his merch table unless he is on stage, and is more than happy to talk with you. P.O.S. is just that kind of guy, he likes to chat and shoot the breeze with his fans, and admittedly likes touring with artists that are the same way.

POS

I’ve been to a lot of concerts, big and small, and I have never been to a show like a P.O.S. show. Without fail he will get down in to the crowd. At the Warped Tour he spent more time at eye level with his fans than on the stage. Besides just the fact that he brings it every time out, I don’t find a mosh pit at many hip-hop shows, but P.O.S. requested it for “Terrorish” so that he could mosh with his fans. As with every show he goes elbow to elbow on the floor rapping with, and not just for, his fans. Even on his more difficult songs the man could just sit back and listen to the words he wrote screamed back to him from 150+ in a seething mass of fandom. He recognizes that he has diehard fans and gets down with them when ever possible because he honestly loves his work, and is humble in his opportunity to do it.

Amazing beats and intellectual lyricism the likes of Dessa, Grieves, and P.O.S. make for maybe a tough pill to swallow for those without the taste for it. P.O.S. is fully aware that there might not be room in the ‘mainstream’ music scene for him but is hopeful. Today the music seems to be more about style over substance. Artists today have everything from their own vodkas to clothing lines. It is all about cultivating a brand and becoming more than just a musician, which is all P.O.S. wants to be right now. In his words, it’s not that mainstream music is dumb, but it is easy, and he recognizes that his music is not easy or just a catchy beat for the money-maker shakers out there. It is not something that he thinks about really, but he won’t ever ‘make it rain’, ‘drop it like it’s hot’, or ‘ride dirty’; this is not the kind of music he likes, and he makes music he likes, it’s just dumb luck that other people like it, too.

Originally published on Disarraymagazine.com

From Slut to Prostitute, NYTimes Finally Making Online Johns of All of Us

Today the New York Times made the inevitable non-press release press release in regards to their plans to begin to charge for their online content. In the tradition of major companies that make statements like this, they were as vague as possible painting the plan in the broadest of strokes to leave them the wiggle room to work this out in the most profitable way. The Times, same as their peers in the industry, give it away online right now, but they laid out a plan to begin charging, in one form or another, for frequent readers, in early 2011. Though this may seem to be a far off time without specifics plans in place, this stands as a move in our industry coming to terms with the fact that the old news model of the brick and mortar paper has officially fallen to the wayside for an organization that is fluid and agile to deliver premium content on demand, for a premium price.

I wrote about this a while back, the need for the industry to change its ways and stop turning a blind eye to the direction the world today is headed. I have always argued that you cannot give away original content online for free that costs money and man hours to produce. Now a days more people have put down the paper and have picked up their phone, or opened their laptop, to get the information and the stories of the day. It is simply more convenient and truly more breaking news online when you can get an update on an event immediately as opposed to waiting until the next day to find out what happened; people want to know what is ‘happening’, and this is the nut in the case for the internet being the best platform for news reporting.

There are many papers, magazines, and publications that don’t even bother producing a text printed medium, they see and appreciate the low overhead and malleability of an online publication. In an afternoon a few folks in a room can change from top to bottom the entire form and look of a website, and then go get dinner. On a whim any producer of online content can get new content up, or can experiment with new media and story telling styles without having to figure out how it fits in the paper or what kind of work the paginator is going to have to do to make room for advertising. Online news websites and journals allow for us to use video, multimedia, and text, to tell every facet of a story that used to be limited by papyrus; today we can be better journalists with the advent of the net, we just need to get paid to do it.

The Times was headed this way no matter the time frame. NYTimes.com has 17 million visitors a month, by far the largest online readership in the industry, and that being the case, they might be the one website an make this change and begin to charge for their content. I heard a while back that there was a consortium of papers willing to begin charging together, so as to not hurt one another. I am not sure as to the validity of that information now, but the Times is only the first paper to do this and you can look forward to every paper in the country eventually charging in one form or another. It has been a long time coming because you can’t charge for the paper, make people pay for the 3D news, but have the same content, and more in fact, free online; this financial backlash was scripted with a model like this one.

What will they do though? How will it be charged. NYTimes was savvy in releasing no details of any kind. They were about as vague as a Republican presidential candidate, in that they wrote a lot of words, but really said nothing. There is no real plan yet for whether there will be a membership flat fee, a free up to a point system, or premium content charging. I know that I like the ESPN model with their ‘insider’ system with a small monthly fee for specific content, while allowing unlimited browsing of general content. I don’t think the system of membership fee per month, like a newspaper subscription. An all or nothing model will not work, you can browse a NYTimes A1 for free waiting in line for coffee, you should be able to browse their homepage the same way. Micro charging may be legitimate in some form, a per article charge to a credit card on file that you save to the site to pay for your browsing, with a maximum limit. Say, if you were to charge two cents an article with a maximum charge of 4 dollars a week or something, or whatever is equal to subscribing to the paper; that is key, not charging more for online content than paper subscribers pay, because you can’t sway people either way and you don’t want to hurt either revenue stream in print and online.

I am on board with the ESPN model, free basic browsing, and you pay more for the specialty content, but maybe they can go farther. The paper might want to think about embracing social networking and strike a deal with the likes of facebook, flickr, and myspace to work out a way to streamline their news content with the news feed or with their own pages. How better to get some of those major sites by charging a small fee to get my NYTimes updates to my homepage on any of these sites. It is one less stop for the reader, I can now get my news of the world with my news on my friends, and it is such a massive market, the paper might be able to pick up extra subscribers that don’t even look at their site now. Symbiotic in the idea to embrace the fact the online content at these papers can’t be totally free, is the embrace of the social aspect of the web and get in to those built in markets like facebook, where you can help your readership kill two birds with one stone.

The very long shot idea is for subscribers to be able to purchase columns and articles written by specific reporters. Imagine a system where you were able buy articles by your favorite writers like you buy music on iTunes. Since they are focusing on regular readers on the website, then they could charge for specific content by specific journalists. For .99 cents a week you can get exclusive content, editorials, or articles like songs. You can read their current work as well as their greatest hits right to the medium of your choice and follow your most trusted news sources. I submit that if Hunter S. Thompson was still around then he would have been on iTunes and charged weekly for articles and his screed as he put them out. If you could buy Hunter by the article or subscribe by the month I would have a lifetime membership to his work. I know this is unlikely, readers often don’t notice or care who actually writes the articles or shoots the photos; journalism is mostly a fame-less business except amongst those of us in the industry.

Whatever they decide to do with the specifics of charging for this high quality content they need to proceed very carefully. Times will be the litmus test for this new idea, and their folly or success will bring a rise in the tides among industry peers for the better or the worse. With this announcement though, I don’t think they will be the nly paper to begin charging for what is now free. Do not be surprised to see USAToday, the Boston Globe, or the LA Times, adopt a similar timeline and idea. You will see the LA Times charging for its premium celebrity gossip and editorials as well as other content. I am so glad to see this trend happening though. Online content and online journalists and photographers work hard, and their content is excellent. It took the old guard a while to admit that it was raining, the water got to their chest before they admitted they might have a problem, but you can’t blame them, it’s tough to change when you are stuck in the old ways and the internet was a ‘fad’. The old newspaper is an analog relic, and in a digital age it is about time we started charging for that content, since this is the future we have created for ourselves, even if it is just a ‘series of tubes’.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 55 other followers